Review Disunity in Christ Uncovering the Hidden Forces That Keep Us Apart
Run across a Problem?
Thanks for telling us about the problem.
Friend Reviews
Customs Reviews
It is a very good book, raising of import questions and suggesting wa
Writing from the perspective of the social psychologist, who as well happens to be a woman and person of color, Christena Cleveland, addresses the problem of disunity within the body of Christ. While most ecumenical conversations focus on doctrine and polity, seeking to detect pathways to unity amongst our diverseness of church building practices and theologies, Cleveland focuses on cultural and ethnic diversity and the dangers of homogeneity.It is a very good book, raising important questions and suggesting means in which the gap can be bridged. Most of the suggested solutions focus on building relationships and common identities that bridge our multifariousness. She does, notwithstanding, rightfully dispel the idea that "color-blindness" is the answer. Colour-blindness rather than helping build bridges by eliminating cultural and ethnic differences fosters them by ignoring or missing those places where privilege suppresses minorities in the proper noun of unity. Beingness more open and frank about our cultural differences tin provide the opportunity to forge a common identity that includes those differences.
Writing equally an evangelical Christian, Cleveland suggests that the key is to forge a common identity in Christ. Nosotros are, ane body in Christ.
Ane business concern or question that I detect it necessary to heighten is this: at what point exercise we find it besides difficult to forge a common identity in ane local torso? I raise this question because I find that there are conservative Christian communities that are very diverse ethnically, merely very narrow theologically. At the same time, I would say that a majority of liberal Protestant churches that let for a wide diversity in theological and political views tend to be fairly homogeneous. I continue to wonder why this is -- and it's non a question that Cleveland raises in her book. Indeed, she skirts theology for the most office. That'due south understandable since she writes as a psychologist and not as a theologian, but information technology is a question that we need to pursue.
...moreWhile this was presented with a cracking deal of evidence and in a disarming manner, I found that the case was almost overst I found this book a mixed bag. On i hand, it presents many fascinating and thought-provoking arguments on our propensity, equally humans, to band together with people who are like us and exclude those who aren't similar us, prejudiced against everything most them often simply considering of their skin colour, beliefs, cultural background, or the simple fact that they disagree with us.
While this was presented with a nifty bargain of evidence and in a convincing manner, I found that the example was almost overstated. I wish the author had spent a piddling less time establishing it and more on explaining how to overcome this tendency.
All the same, information technology's still a worthwhile and center-opening read.
...more than
I could quote you dozens and dozens of lines and passages, just in
This book. 🙌🏼 This was i I read and studied with a church small group concluding autumn, which I think is the manner it should exist read. The discussions nosotros had (every bit Blackness, white, Hispanic, male/female person, varied age believers) were challenging and rich and catalytic. I'm so grateful for the manner we were able to use this wise and thoughtful book as a launching betoken into really honest, sometimes difficult, incredibly helpful and hopeful conversations.I could quote you dozens and dozens of lines and passages, but instead, I'll recommend you read it yourself (with others!!) if y'all're a person of faith wondering how we do this work of reconciliation and rebuilding every bit a trunk of Christ.
...moreThis is an audience-centered read, specially if the audience is new to formal learning on the sociological dynamics of gimmicky Christian communities. For that audience, this is a thoroughly attainable and readable intro. It is accessible considering it establishes a sociological foundation via basic vocabulary, categories, and studies. Information technology
For those looking to build sociological literacy but have no thought where to search or are too intimidated by dumbo articles, go here; Cleveland curates well.This is an audience-centered read, peculiarly if the audience is new to formal learning on the sociological dynamics of gimmicky Christian communities. For that audience, this is a thoroughly accessible and readable intro. Information technology is accessible because it establishes a sociological foundation via basic vocabulary, categories, and studies. It is readable because it uses a articulate and whimsically-edgy manner for story-telling and statistics-citing alike. Even the repetition in latter capacity proves useful for readers that are just commencement to recall sociologically.
This is perfect for a small-scale group, book discussion, etc. For those looking for more formal interaction (case studies, models, bibliographies, etc.), try The Elusive Dream: The Power of Race in Interracial Churches.
...moreThat being said, I highly recommend this to anyone in the church - members, elders, bishops, pastors, youth leaders, etc., and everyone struggling to reconcile these issues that the church faces today.
...moreI found this to exist a helpful, idea-provoking, convicting, and hopeful book. It took me a while to go used to the frequent references to different studies and experiments, but it grew on me and I appreciated the intersection she brings betwixt social psychology and theology. It seems like even since she wrote this book, people are treating each other worse than always. But I experience convicted to baby-sit my language (both in "existent life" and online) especially in regard to other believer
A Helpful ReadI institute this to exist a helpful, thought-provoking, convicting, and hopeful book. It took me a while to get used to the frequent references to different studies and experiments, merely information technology grew on me and I appreciated the intersection she brings between social psychology and theology. It seems like even since she wrote this book, people are treating each other worse than e'er. But I feel convicted to baby-sit my language (both in "real life" and online) peculiarly in regard to other believers, even if I perceive there to be big differences between us. These concepts feel really important for our current cultural climate!
...moreTwo complaints. One pocket-sized. One major.
Minor: The book was a chip repetitive. Information technology boiled down to a few big ideas and could've been shorter.
Major: She does not explain where nosotros should draw the line between groups. Considering sometimes we must.
Cleveland's goal is obviously to promote unity between diverse groups within the trunk of Christ. Her principal idea is to come across others as pa
Large pic, this is a really good book. I loved the examples from sociological enquiry. There was enough to put into practice.Ii complaints. One pocket-sized. One major.
Minor: The book was a bit repetitive. Information technology boiled downwardly to a few large ideas and could've been shorter.
Major: She does not explain where nosotros should draw the line between groups. Because sometimes we must.
Cleveland'southward goal is evidently to promote unity between diverse groups within the trunk of Christ. Her main thought is to see others every bit part of "we" rather than "they." She gave lots of different examples of the cultural divisions that tin be overcome this way, including ethnicity, historic period, gender, marital condition, political viewpoints, etc. This was mostly great, simply there were times when she included things in the greater "we" that I thought should be excluded.
The main example that came up several times was people who are pro-life and people who are pro-choice. I can sympathize trying to unite people across viewpoints that are both acceptable under the large umbrella of Christianity. But in that location are boundaries. A pro-choice person may exist a member of the trunk of Christ (i.e. saved, belonging to God and God's people), only that doesn't hateful at that place viewpoint needs to be affirmed as a valid Christian option. It isn't simply a cultural barrier when ane person says, "That's murder," and some other person says it is not. That'southward a massive gap in moral understanding with grave consequences.
My principal point is not about abortion here. That example merely highlighted for me the question that I wish she had addressed. How do you know when you lot must depict lines between groups and/or exclude certain views/behaviors from existence adequate within a group? I'm not talking nigh being hostile or unkind towards people, but not anybody/everything fits in the "in group." There is an "out group" somewhere. How exercise I know who they are?
The apostles seemed to brand these kinds of distinctions between who was in and out of the customs. I think we divide over besides many things (and I am in enthusiastic understanding with Cleveland's projection). But I think some division protects the church building. So, I desire to know how to think through when that makes sense to practise.
...moreInsights:
- The enquiry most the superiority of diverse leadership teams to homogeneous ones was very compelling.
- The inquiry concerning the bidirectional effects of
Insights:
- The research about the superiority of various leadership teams to homogeneous ones was very compelling.
- The research concerning the bidirectional effects of prejudice and separation was eye-opening!
- Her description of the outgroup homogeneity upshot was really helpful to requite words to why "we" care for "them" with so little grace.
- Her analysis of BIRGing (basking in reflected glory) and CORFing (cut off reflected failure) gave sociological terminology to a very prevalent miracle in all social relationships.
Bug:
Cleveland moves fluidly across a multifariousness of divisions we see in the church (race, class, political affiliation, theological view). However, her assay and application does not change when the topic changes. I found most problematic when she shifted to divisions over theology. She argues that nosotros should not be dividing over beliefs, simply pressing into our unity as the body of Christ. I find this cocky-defeating since the doctrine of the body of Christ IS a Christian doctrine that must be properly defined. She chastises for calling each other 'heretics' (I agree this term is oft overused over pocket-size doctrinal points), when nosotros are part of the ane trunk. And however this term is a technical 1 designed to draw those who take departed from definitional Christian doctrine. Rather than pursuing doctrinal unity by more careful report of Scripture where nosotros motility closer to Christ and truth, and a house understanding of the creeds and confessions where we tin can distinguish between primary, secondary, and tertiary doctrines, it seems that Cleveland would rather united states telephone call anybody "us" regardless of what the Lord has said through his Word.
Cleveland teaches various psychological theories and ideas of exclusion and disunity. She does so with humor, relatability, and scripture. This book dips into academia in a very warm, welcoming, and like shooting fish in a barrel to read way. I have never read a volume both as studious and every bit easy to read. Cleveland is a chief.
Near of Dr. Cleveland's solutions are variations on the same crucial theme: followers of Jesus demand to develop a common identity rather than dividing over our lesser identities. Nosotros must encounter each other as members of the same family rather than as opposing smaller identities. Christians need not divide over ethnic, political, or even theological purlieus lines, but rather, see each other every bit family members because of the reconciling work Jesus has done and because of the in dwelling house Holy Spirit. I deeply appreciate and resonate with the work Cleveland has done here and am then grateful to put much of her education to practice in my community. A few quotes:
"Focusing on shared characteristics and taking the perspective of the other are small but powerful steps that will lead us toward unity." 77
"When we categorize, not only do nosotros draw a very clear line between those who are like usa and those who are not like usa, but we also tend to call up that all of the people who are not like u.s. are the aforementioned. Information technology'south not just that they are all different from us; they are all different in the same way." 51
"Rather than perceiving the body of Christ as i large group, we oftentimes perceive numerous singled-out groups within the torso of Christ... by focusing on smaller, distinct categories for church building groups, nosotros erect and fixate on divisions that are far less important than the larger, diverse group of members of the torso of Christ." 49
"If we want to know how to embody the household of God, we demand look no farther than to Jesus. While on earth, Jesus modeled this new reality by connecting with every type of person around— bourgeois theologians, liberal theologians, prostitutes, divorcees, children's, politicians, people who party difficult, military servicemen, women, lepers, ethnic minorities, celebrities and so forth— and inviting them to be role of his grouping and to work together to bring wholeness to their croaky and crumbling world." 37
"Jesus pursues is despite theological differences, his theology is more comprehensive and accurate than any of ours. He too pursued us despite cultural differences; he's holy, nosotros're sinful— that's a pretty significant 'cultural' difference. Finally, the incarnation is evidence that he pursues u.s.a. despite concrete differences. His actions and words suggest that he is serious about our connecting, in spite of physical, cultural, and theological differences." 36
"To the extend that I accept the work of the cross every bit my invitation to participate in the self-giving intimacy of the Trinity, I must be prepared to comprehend self-giving intimacy with the 'other.' To partake in the sacrificial beloved with all others, not just the ones who are part of my homogenous Christian group." 35
On grouping polarization, "In the absence of various influences, homogenous group members tend to adopt more farthermost and bigoted thinking as time passes." 27
"People can see God within their cultural context but in gild to follow God, they must cross into other cultures because that's what Jesus did in the incarnation and on the cross. Discipleship is cross-cultural." 21
"Rather than using his power to distance himself from usa, Jesus uses it to approach united states of america. " 16
"Jesus doesn't distance himself from me even though, allow'south face information technology, I'm non always proficient for PR. I can do the same for other Christians." 17
On social identity theory, "when it comes to group membership, nosotros practice iv things to maintain positive cocky-esteem: (1) we tend to gravitate toward and form groups with similar others; (two) once the grouping is formed we engage in group-serving biases that defend the group'south positive identity; (3) nosotros try to increase our status by associating with higher-status groups and distancing ourselves from lower-status groups; and (four) if all else fails nosotros literally disparage other groups because in doing and so, we elevate our own group." 84-85
"I call back that this picture of a good for you marriage is a great model of how the torso of Christ should work. Theoretically, married people can't quit a marriage. In the same way, theoretically, Christians can't quit the body of Christ. Our commitment to the other members of the body of Christ should grump our desire to CORF (cutting off reflected failure) when the going gets tough and it would be better for our self-esteem if nosotros just walked away— similar when nosotros disagree on an important event or when the other group's heart isn't in the right place and they hurt u.s., or when the other group speaks a different language. Our submission to God, irrevocable commitment to each other, and interdependence should hold united states together when nosotros want to distance ourselves from Christians who fail to live usa to our gold standards or who complicate our lives." 95
"We need to adopt the belief that to be a follower of Christ means to care deeply almost and pursue other followers of Christ, including the ones that nosotros don't instinctively value or like. We demand to adopt the belief that to be a follower of Christmeans to allow our identity as members of the trunk of Christ to trump all other identities. We need to adopt the belief that to be a follower of Chris means to put our commitment to the body of Christ above our own identity and self-esteem needs. We've coped with our divisions long enough. It's time for us to detect our true identities as members of the family of God. It's time for us to rally around this identity, overcome our divisions, and change the world. In sum, it's time for us to alter the way nosotros come across ourselves." 97-98
"When my identity is rooted in the right place, I'thou able to listen to opposing viewpoints equally a member of the body of Christ: with humility, with an eagerness to learn from a different point of view, with a want to connect across cultural lines, with conviction in my identity and without fear." 115
"Within the context of the larger body of Christ, when we interact with fellow Christians who possess a different cultural viewpoint or tradition, nosotros are often interacting with what we perceive to be black sheep. Due to the gold standard outcome, we believe that our culturally influenced beliefs and practices are the best ones and that our cultural group should be the standard against which all other cultural groups should exist measured. Every bit a effect of this thinking, anyone who disagrees with usa is perceived as someone who is declining to live upward to the cultural grouping's standards— a black sheep.
The mere being of these so-called blackness sheep threatens to blur what we perceive to exist the of import behavior and practices that differentiate Christians from everyone else. Rather than remaining cognitively open to our culturally different fellow followers of Christ who might offer a much-needed perspective, we dig out heels in and seek cognitive closure. In doing and so, we tell ourselves that these people are blackness sheep who deserve the black sheep treatment— and we are happy to oblige by calling them heretics." 131
"As nosotros brainstorm to modify the way nosotros see ourselves— through adopting more than inclusive linguistic communication, doing self-affirmation exercises that remind us of common membership in the torso of Christ, and overriding the furnishings of natural categorizing— nosotros will begin to meet that they are role of usa. One time they go us, they will no longer be threatening... nosotros volition be able to prepare aside our fearfulness of ambiguity, relax our competitive opinion, and prefer a promotion orientation that enables u.s. to lean in to hear from a culturally different viewpoint, rather than recoil in fear." 136-137
"Without (crosscultural) contact, our errors continue to go unchallenged and often begin to take on lives of their ain. As a bonus, contact reduces the feet that people might have nearly interacting with other groups... cross cultural contact works it's magic by (1) requiring people to meet different group members as individuals, rather than nameless, faceless members of a cultural grouping, and (2) creating a context in which the 2 different groups are encouraged to grade a common identity... individuals who engage in cross-cultural contact are much more probable to see members of different cultural groups in accurate, cognitively generous means and to expand their category of us to include those whom they used to consider outgroup members." 154-55
"I will lose my will to stay in the fight if I lose sight of the painful toll that Christ endured in order to reconcile himself to me. I will lose my will to stay in the fight if I lose sight of the face that fifty-fifty the about seemingly ineffective reconciliation work lives on in the ability of the resurrection and will one day have its intended impact. If our piece of work is not rooted in the power of the cross, nosotros will inevitably quit." 156-157
"Four elements are needed for positive cross-cultural interaction: (1) working toward a larger goal, (two) creating equal status, (three) engaging in personal interaction and (4) providing leadership." 158
"When nosotros enter crosscultural situations with the belief that our cultural group is holding one piece to the puzzle, nosotros can confidently brand our own contribution while besides looking for and valuing the contributions that other groups brand, and as a issue, the barriers between us and them begin to fall downwardly." 162
"Before 2 groups can enjoy renewed, good for you friendship, past wrongs must be made right through repentance, forgiveness, and the render of stolen commodities (such as power, land, condition, coin). This might exist the most difficult element to successfully pull off because it requires that both groups (especially the college-status group) recognize any power or status differences that exist between them, repent for them and make a unified, concerted endeavour to erase them in the context of the crosscultural situation and beyond." 166
"Mattering and marginality cost on opposite ends of a continuum, such that the more an private feels like she matters and is empowered, the less she feels marginalized and disempowered, and vice versa." 168
...more"Jesus talked sheep to shepherds, fish to fishermen, and bookish theology to academic theologians. He was all things to all people. I call back that our differences enable the states to speak richly and directly to the hearts o
I feel like this is a must-read for anyone who wants to engage in reconciliation work. Honey the way Cleveland combines sociology, theology, and personal stories to lay out clear, simple only challenging steps to work toward unity. I also only found the studies she discussed fascinating."Jesus talked sheep to shepherds, fish to fishermen, and academic theology to bookish theologians. He was all things to all people. I think that our differences enable united states of america to speak richly and straight to the hearts of all types of people...We often fail to make a stardom between evangelism and discipleship. People can MEET God within their cultural context merely in club to FOLLOW God, they must cross into other cultures because that's what Jesus did in the incarnation and on the cross. Discipleship is crosscultural" (p. 20-21).
"We must relentlessly set on inaccurate perceptions in everyday interactions, weekly sermons, denominational meetings and dinner table conversations...Nosotros need to turn off autopilot and take time to honestly examine our polluted perceptions...We must take active steps to expand our category of 'us' then that 'they' are at present included in 'usa'" (p. 61-62).
"Everyone wants diversity, but no i wants to actually be diverse...Churches and Christian organizations desire participants from diverse cultures but are too obsessed with their own civilisation to let diverse people to influence it. Rather, they crave diverse people to assimilate and bow downwardly to the ascendant civilisation" (p. 184).
...moreA friend recommended Christena Cleveland's Disunity in Christ to assistance me think through what drives us to interruption that unity. I'grand glad I read it, and I walk away with my understanding of grouping identity dynamics confirmed and even strengthened.
Cleveland opens DIC with a cleverly writte
In times of broad church conflict, returning to Jesus' command to love one some other seems right. I've been dwelling on what holds us together. That and Paul's frequent, overflowing descriptions of the unity of the body.A friend recommended Christena Cleveland's Disunity in Christ to assistance me think through what drives u.s. to pause that unity. I'm glad I read information technology, and I walk away with my understanding of group identity dynamics confirmed and even strengthened.
Cleveland opens DIC with a cleverly written chapter. Unfortunately the quality of writing declines in the centre of the book. DIC references many social psychology studies (with the strangest endnote citation format I've always encountered!). These kind of studies make clever writing difficult, and Cleveland's writing in these chs reflects this challenge. It's readable and understandable, merely not delightful.
The very best part of DIC is the penultimate ch. Building on all of the social psychology of the chs 2-eight, Cleveland offers strategic how-to instruction for overcoming the forces that drive us autonomously. The book is worth the read if only for ch 9.
A useful book I'll folio through over again in coming days.
...moreHer scholarly piece of work includes integrating social psychological perspectives on intergroup and intercultural processes with current reconciliation dilemmas inside the Christian church and the broader society. Her enquiry examines how culture influences theological/ideological approaches to peacemaking and reconciliation; how social processes, such as identity and self-esteem, impede a group's ability to reconcile with culturally-dissimilar groups; and how individual factors (east.m., professed theologies/ideologies) collaborate with social factors (e.1000., the status of i's social group) to allow certain individuals or groups to dominate others.
Christena has published her work in scholarly journals – such as Minor Grouping Research for which she received a 2011 Best Article award – as well as magazines – such every bit Christianity Today, which named her as 1 of 33 millennials leading the next generation of Christian faith.
In her volume, Disunity in Christ: Uncovering the Hidden Forces that Proceed United states Autonomously (Intervarsity Press, 2013), she examines and offers research-based strategies to overcome the nonconscious cerebral, emotional, and identity processes that pull Christians into homogeneous groups, fuel inaccurate perceptions of culturally-unlike others, contribute to an "Us vs. Them" mentality, stimulate intergroup prejudice and hostility, and ultimately inhibit reconciliation. The book received a 2013 Leadership Journal Volume Laurels. Christena is currently researching and writing The Priesthood of the Privileged, which investigates ability and inequality in the church, and proposes methods for addressing and reducing this equality as a pathway to reconciliation.
A 5th generation government minister, Christena comes from a long tradition of leadership in the Church of God in Christ (COGIC) denomination, ranging from bishops to pastors to laypeople. She currently ministers in various ecumenical settings.
Christena is a lifelong Oakland A's fan and holds a quality cup of tea in high regard. She lives in Durham, North Carolina.
...moreRelated Articles
Welcome back. Just a moment while nosotros sign you in to your Goodreads account.
hollidayagrad1954.blogspot.com
Source: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/17861722-disunity-in-christ
0 Response to "Review Disunity in Christ Uncovering the Hidden Forces That Keep Us Apart"
Post a Comment